Defining the Framework
Feminist Evaluation is an approach that intentionally examines and challenges unequal power relations while generating knowledge that advances gender equality, social justice, and human rights. In practical terms for Women’s Rights Organizations (WROs), this means that before an organization signs off on how a programme will be evaluated, it asks community members and WROs to help shape what counts as success, rather than merely inviting them to review findings afterward.
The Adamawa State Scenario: Traditional vs. Feminist Practice
To understand what distinguishes traditional evaluation from feminist evaluation, consider this case scenario presented in the module:
The Scenario: An external male consultant is hired to evaluate a Women’s Empowerment Programme in Adamawa State. He designs the survey questionnaire himself in his office, sets all indicators before ever visiting the community, collects data, and presents his final report directly to the donor. The women whose lives the programme was meant to transform never see the final report or the conclusions drawn about them.
|
WAS THE CONSULTANT’S APPROACH FEMINIST? NO. Every step was procedurally and technically sound according to standard evaluation practice. However, because the community had no say in defining success and never saw the findings, it represents TRADITIONAL, EXTRACTIVE EVALUATION. |
Key Learning Takeaway: What makes an evaluation traditional is not a flaw in technical quality, but the total absence of community power in defining success and owning the evidence.