Feminist Evaluation does not happen in a vacuum; it aligns with four major global shifts in international cooperation:
|
GLOBAL DRIVERS OF FEMINIST EVALUATION |
|---|
|
1. Feminist Foreign Policies Prioritizing gender equality across development initiatives. |
2. Localization Shifting leadership & funding directly to local WROs. |
3. Decolonization Challenging Western “gold standard” evidence norms. |
4. SEGs Centering Structurally Excluded Groups in Evaluation. |
Localization in Evaluation
Localization means shifting leadership, decision-making, funding, and accountability from international agencies to national organizations and local evaluators.
- Example: Instead of a UK-based firm flying in a lead evaluator for a Nigerian programme, a Nigerian WRO or local firm leads evaluation design, with international partners in a supporting role.
Decolonizing Evidence
Decolonization challenges the assumption that knowledge, evidence, and standards developed in Western or international institutions are automatically superior or default.
- Example: An international standard might treat a Randomized Controlled Trial (RCT) as the “gold standard” while dismissing oral storytelling as “anecdotal.” Decolonizing evaluation recognizes a community’s oral tradition as valid evidence in its own right.
|
THE DECOLONIZING QUESTIONS TO ASK • Whose knowledge counts? • Who defines what constitutes “rigorous evidence”? • Who decides what success looks like? • Who benefits from the evaluation findings? |